ABSTRACT
Background To manage the sanitary crisis and rapidly assess the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the canton of Geneva, we invited previous participants of an annual health survey of the general population to a first serological test. As the pandemic progressed, it become clear that there would be a significant longer impact on health and wellbeing of population. Moreover, there was a need to assess the adherence of the population regarding COVID-19 prevention measures, over time, as well as to provide scientific knowledge about antibodies dynamics and protection from new infections. For all these reasons, a long-term follow-up has been settled via the dedicated digital platform Specchio-COVID19 and on-line questionnaires and repeated serological tests. Methods Several measures were designed to maintain high retention and involvement, including regular electronic newsletters with links to a “News” webpage, a “Research” webpage for dissemination of publications and the organization of webinars specifically dedicated to participants. A specific email address and a dedicated hotline were set up so that participants can get in touch with the Specchio-COVID19 team. Results Specchio-COVID19 was launched in November, 2020. Up to February 2022, 10'946 individuals (57% women, median age 48) joined the project. Over time, participation rate remains around 65% for each release of questionnaire. 550 participants (5%) definitely dropped out. Conclusions Our digital cohort facilitates participants’ involvement, allowing participation from remote locations, organizing webinar, promoting news and scientific information via newsletters and specific webpages and enabling interaction between researchers and participants. Key messages • When designing the Specchio-COVID19 digital cohort, the purpose was not only to collect data. • But to establish a reciprocal exchange of information between researchers and participants, fostering long-term involvement and health empowerment.
ABSTRACT
Background: Liquid biopsy technology has delivered promising results for therapy monitoring and disease relapse detection. The simplicity of the procedure makes it attractive for early cancer detection despite its clinical value in this setting being as yet unknown. The objective of the study is to evaluate the acceptance of this new screening technology by the general population. Methods: Participants in a digital health study originally selected randomly from the general population of the canton of Geneva (Switzerland) were invited to participate in a survey investigating (1) their motivation and (2) what factors might affect their decision regarding whether to proceed to a liquid biopsy test for cancer screening. Results: 2'898 participants responded to the survey (participation rate: 35%), 1'568 are > 50yo. Two thirds are female, 7.6% have a history of cancer, 80.8% have a family relative with a history of cancer. In the whole population: 97.7% are ready to use liquid biopsy as a cancer screening test. In the > 50yo, 97.3% of women and 98.5% of men would do the test. In the < 50yo, 97.2% of women and 98.6% of men would take it with X2 = 0.018 (p = 0.89) for independence with sex. Age category, education level, income band, professional status, self-rated health, tobacco status, chronic disease, personal or familial history of cancer and COVID pandemic have no statistical impact on the incentive to do a liquid biopsy test. In the whole population, 94.6% would take the test knowing that there is a risk of a false positive. The median accepted false positive percentage error rate is 10% with interquartile rate (IQR) Q1: 5% and Q3: 15%. Ninety-six percent of respondents would take the test knowing that there is a risk of a false negative, accepting a median false negative percentage error rate of 10% with IQR Q1: 5% and Q3 : 20%. Most respondents (97.6%) will do the test knowing that additional tests or procedures could be required in case of positivity and 58.8% would take it yearly, while 24.6% only every two years. Fifty-nine percent believe that taking the test could influence their lifestyle, regardless of the result. Conclusions: This study shows that the surveyed population is ready to engage with liquid biopsy as a cancer screening tool despite its limitations and drawbacks. Willingness to take the test might depend on sex only in the < 50yo population. Knowing the lack of demonstrated benefit, it is urgent to conduct trials assessing the clinical value, psychological impact and financial burden of liquid biopsy tests before incorporating this technology into cancer screening programs. Due to the very high level of interest demonstrated in our study, the possibility of direct-to-consumer availability should prompt health authorities and accreditation bodies to carefully weigh the impact of authorizing market access to liquid biopsy technologies for this purpose.